AP
Ana Paula L.Verified purchase
Your cart is empty
Add prompt packs to continue
Copy, paste and use them in your favorite AI:
Just $0.08 per prompt · one-time payment
100 resources included
This definitive collection of prompts for AI represents the cutting edge of instructional design applied to contemporary political science. Specifically designed for advisors, consultants and public officials, each command allows you to transform complex data into high-impact political strategies, ensuring technical rigor and institutional viability in each response generated.
He acts as a Senior Public Policy Consultant specialized in evidence-based diagnosis for the state sector. Your primary objective is to design an exhaustive 'Empirical evidence collection' protocol strictly applied to the analysis of the [Specific public problem] that affects [Population or State Sector]. The purpose of this phase is to transcend subjective perceptions and base state intervention on rigorous data that allows for the precise identification of the root causes of the problem analyzed through a mixed research methodology. To begin, develop a data triangulation strategy that integrates primary and secondary sources. In the quantitative field, it describes the process to extract, clean and process microdata from [Official data sources or Institutional Repositories] to establish significant correlations between the variables of [Dependent variable] and the risk factors identified in [Independent variable]. You must define the diagnostic key performance indicators (KPIs) and the statistical validity criteria necessary for the collected evidence to be considered binding in an audit process or government impact evaluation. In the qualitative dimension, design a technical collection guide that includes the execution of semi-structured interviews with [Key Actors or Stakeholders] and the conduct of focus groups with [Beneficiaries of the program/policy]. It specifies in detail how the coding of narratives will be carried out to transform testimonies into actionable empirical evidence, ensuring neutrality and minimizing confirmation biases by the technical team of [Name of Public Entity]. Provide examples of trigger questions that allow us to delve deeper into the institutional and operational barriers that limit the effectiveness of current solutions. Finally, it generates an 'Empirical Evidence Matrix' structure that organizes the findings according to their source, level of reliability (low, medium, high), strategic relevance for the diagnosis and detected information gaps (data gaps). The resulting report must include a critical section on ethical limitations and access to information in the context of [Legal Framework or applicable Transparency Law], proposing mitigation mechanisms to guarantee the integrity of the evidence throughout the public policy diagnostic cycle. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
Instant access after purchase from your dashboard. Just copy and paste into your AI.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Qwen and any AI chat.
Yes. Every prompt includes bracketed fields where you insert your own information, context and specifics, so they fit your situation, country or industry.
Yes. Above you can read full sample prompts, exactly as you'll receive them, to check the quality before paying.
Yes. Pay once and they're yours forever, updates included.
He acts as a senior consulting expert in public policy analysis with specialization in political science and state management. Your main objective is to carry out a rigorous and technical identification of a specific public problem within the sector of [Sector or Specific Area] in the context of [Territory or Geographic Entity]. A public problem is not only a lack, but a discrepancy between a current situation and a desired one that requires state intervention. Therefore, you must begin by clearly defining the problem, avoiding formulating it as the lack of a predetermined solution, and focusing on the measurable negative impacts suffered by the [Affected Population]. To deepen the diagnosis, apply the Problem Tree methodology. It hierarchically identifies the root causes (structural, institutional or market) and the direct and indirect effects that this phenomenon generates on social well-being and governance. It is essential that you integrate the following reference data into your analysis: [Statistical Data or Documentary Evidence]. Additionally, it considers the existing political tensions and current regulatory frameworks that could be limiting the State's ability to respond in this particular case. Perform a detailed mapping of interested actors (Stakeholders). Classify them according to their level of influence and their degree of affectation by the problem. Identify possible coalitions of support or veto, and analyze how the incentives of these actors shape the persistence of the problem on the public agenda. Make sure to distinguish between government actors at different levels (national, regional, local) and civil society or private sector actors that have relevance in [Socioeconomic Context]. Subsequently, evaluate the magnitude and urgency of the problem based on criteria of social relevance, political viability, and cost of inaction. You must explain why this phenomenon deserves a space on the institutional agenda and what the risks are of not intervening in the short term. It uses the concept of 'Framing' to propose two different ways of presenting the problem to public opinion, depending on the interests of the ruling coalition in [Name of Institution]. Finally, construct a 'Problem Statement' that is concise, based on evidence and that guides the subsequent design of solution alternatives. The final result must be a diagnostic report structured in technical sections: Contextualization, Causal Diagnosis, Actor Analysis and Prioritization Recommendation, maintaining a neutral and academic tone typical of political science, always considering [Budgetary or Legal Limitations]. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
He acts as a Senior Consultant in Public Management and Political Science, with extensive experience in territorial diagnosis and the design of state strategies at the subnational level. Your mission is to develop a highly accurate "Local Needs Assessment" for the region of [Name of Locality/Municipality/District], focusing specifically on the area of [Specific State Sector: Health, Education, Security, Infrastructure]. This analysis is the first critical step for the public policy cycle and should serve to identify existing service gaps and unmet citizen demands under a framework of democratic governance and administrative efficiency. To begin, carry out a situation analysis based on the collection of indicators from [Suggested Data Source: Eg. Censuses, Household Surveys, Administrative Records]. You must identify the central public problem and break it down using a Problem Tree technique, clearly differentiating between the structural causes (lack of budget, institutional weakness, obsolete regulatory framework) and the direct causes (lack of personnel, poor infrastructure, slow bureaucratic processes). Make sure that the diagnosis considers the geographic and demographic particularities of [Mention vulnerable or specific population groups]. The report must include a Mapping of Key Actors (Stakeholders), classifying them according to their level of influence and their interest in solving the problem in [Name of Location]. It identifies possible sources of social conflict and pressure groups that could oppose or facilitate future interventions. Additionally, propose a needs prioritization matrix based on three fundamental criteria: Social Impact (number of beneficiaries), Political Urgency (media pressure or international commitments) and Technical/Financial Feasibility considering an estimated budget of [Budget Amount or Limitation]. Finally, it concludes with a series of strategic recommendations for the formulation of the resulting public policy. These recommendations should include citizen participation mechanisms for validation of the detected needs and suggest at least three Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to monitor progress once the solutions are implemented. The tone of the document should be technical, neutral, evidence-based and decision-oriented for high-level authorities in the [Specific State Sector] sector. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
It's a master instruction, optimized for AI.
Prompt
your instruction
AI
Result
EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE PROTOCOL — [PROBLEM] 1. Research questions · Hypotheses and observable variables 2. Sources and instruments · Administrative data + survey + key interviews · Validity criteria and triangulation 3. Fieldwork plan · Sampling, schedule and bias control
··· the full result continues ···
Based on 6 reviews
It's fine, nothing more. Some prompts are great and others more generic. Works if you customize it.
Worth every penny. They saved me hours of work in the first week. I'll buy again without hesitation.
Best purchase I made this month. The prompts are really well thought out and the effort shows. Already recommended them to my team.
It's fine, nothing more. They work as a starting point. Acceptable.
Exactly what I was looking for. They saved me hours of work in the first week. I'll buy again without hesitation.
Delivers what it promises. They adapt well with a few tweaks. I recommend it.