JS
Jorge S.Verified purchase
Your cart is empty
Add prompt packs to continue
100 professional prompts ready to copy and paste into ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini.
In the dynamic and demanding legal world, efficiency and accuracy are crucial. This collection has been designed as a strategic tool for lawyers, prosecutors, and law students seeking to harness the power of artificial intelligence in their daily practice. These prompts are meticulously structured to transform the way you interact with AI, allowing you to delegate complex tasks, streamline research, and improve the quality of your documents. From drafting complex contracts and analyzing case law to preparing litigation strategies and communicating with clients, this guide will help you optimize your workflow and achieve superior results.
Just $0.08 per prompt · one-time payment
An instruction. The basis of every AI result.
Prompt
your instruction
AI
100 resources included
He acts as a High Level Legal Consultant and Jurisprudence Analyst specialized in the doctrine emanating from the Supreme Court. Your task is to carry out a surgical breakdown and a technical-legal summary of the sentence that will be provided to you, focusing on the extraction of binding precedents for the case [Name of Procedure or Reference]. First, identify the essential Factual Background, discarding accessory procedural information to focus on the events that motivated the appeal. It is vital that you determine exactly what the substantive conflict is that the Court is resolving in this instance and what were the previous resolutions of the lower instances that have been the subject of challenge. Second, it exhaustively analyzes the Fundamentals of Law. You must categorize each legal argument used by the Chamber, clearly differentiating between the 'Ratio Decidendi' (the direct reason that decides the case and creates jurisprudence) and the 'Obiter Dicta' (additional comments that, although not binding, offer light on the Court's interpretation). In this section, place special emphasis on the interpretation of [Articles of the Law or Specific Code] and how they apply to the current controversy, extracting the legal maxims that the Court establishes as doctrine. Third, examine the Case Law Cited within the ruling. It indicates whether the Supreme Court is following a consolidated line (Stare Decisis), if it is clarifying a contradictory doctrine between Provincial Courts, or if there is a change in doctrinal direction (Overruling). If the ruling includes Individual Opinions, it summarizes the thesis of the dissenting judges, evaluating whether their arguments could gain weight in the future or if they indicate a possible evolution of the majority criterion. Fourth, generate a Strategic Conclusions section for the lawyer. It details how this ruling can be invoked in other similar litigation, identifying the 'strengths' for the party that obtained the favorable ruling and the 'vulnerability points' for the losing party. The result should be a high-quality internal working document, with a strictly professional, technical and academic tone, ready to be integrated into a legal knowledge database or used to prepare a detailed report for the client [Name of Client or Entity]. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering. Important: do not invent citations, case numbers, rulings, studies, or references. If you cannot verify them against real sources (web search or documents I provide), say so clearly, base the analysis on general criteria, and point out which data I should verify in official sources.
Instant access after purchase from your dashboard. Just copy and paste into your AI.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Qwen and any AI chat.
Yes. Every prompt includes bracketed fields where you insert your own information, context and specifics, so they fit your situation, country or industry.
Yes. Above you can read full sample prompts, exactly as you'll receive them, to check the quality before paying.
Yes. Pay once and they're yours forever, updates included.
Result
He acts as an expert lawyer in Labor Law with extensive experience in resolving collective and individual conflicts. Your primary objective is to prepare a 'Report on Substantial Modification of Working Conditions' of high technical complexity, based on current legislation [COUNTRY/RULE, EX: ART. 41 SPAIN WORKER STATUTE] and in the most recent jurisprudential doctrine. The report should begin with a thorough analysis of the nature of the modification proposed by the employer. Accurately determine whether changes in [SPECIFY AREA: WORKSHOP, SCHEDULE, COMPENSATION SYSTEM, DUTIES OR PERFORMANCE] legally qualify as 'substantial'. To do this, it evaluates the quantitative and qualitative impact of the measure on the original employment contract, analyzing whether the balance of benefits and the real harm caused to the affected worker or group is broken. Subsequently, you must conduct rigorous scrutiny of the alleged business justification. Analyzes whether the [ECONOMIC, TECHNICAL, ORGANIZATIONAL OR PRODUCTION (ETOP)] causes presented by the company in [REFERENCE DOCUMENT OR NOTIFICATION] comply with the canon of reasonableness, proportionality and necessity required by the courts. The report must detect possible weaknesses in the accreditation of these causes, evaluating whether there is a logical connection between the measure adopted and the objective of improving the competitiveness or viability of the organization. It breaks down in detail the formal procedure carried out. Verify strict compliance with the notice periods of [NUMBER OF DAYS] and, if it is a collective modification, analyze the development of the consultation period with the Legal Representation of Workers (RLT). You must place special emphasis on the existence or absence of 'good faith' during the negotiation and on the delivery of the required documentation so that the representatives could make an informed judgment. The report concludes with a 'Legal Opinion and Strategy' section. If the report is for the defense of the worker, it details the options for judicial challenge, the request for compensated termination of [X] days per year worked or acceptance under reservation. If it is for the company, it suggests legal protection measures to avoid the declaration of nullity due to defects in form or lack of cause. Consistently cites the jurisprudence of the [SUPREME COURT / SUPERIOR COURT] that is applicable to this specific case of fact. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering. Important: do not invent citations, case numbers, rulings, studies, or references. If you cannot verify them against real sources (web search or documents I provide), say so clearly, base the analysis on general criteria, and point out which data I should verify in official sources.
He acts as a lawyer specializing in Immigration Law and Administrative Law in Spain, with extensive experience in drafting administrative appeals and litigation before the Secretary of State for Migration. Your objective is to write a complete and professional draft of an appeal for [Repossession / Appeal] against the administrative resolution with file number [File Number], which denies the request for [Type of Authorization: e.g. Residence due to Social Roots, Family Reunification, Long Term] presented by the citizen [Name and Surname of the Interested Party] with NIE [NIE Number] and address for notification purposes in [Full Address]. The body of the appeal must begin with a detailed statement of the 'Facts', chronologically narrating the procedural iter from the initial request to the notification of the denial resolution on [Notification Date]. You must make special emphasis that the interested party complies with all the substantive and formal requirements required by Organic Law 4/2000 and Royal Decree 557/2011, pointing out any factual or legal error committed by the Immigration Office in the assessment of the evidence provided, such as [Describe specific error: e.g. lack of assessment of canceled criminal records, omission of sufficient financial means or family ties]. In the 'Legal Fundamentals' section, develop a deep legal argument invoking the relevant articles of Law 39/2015 on Common Administrative Procedure. You must include reasoning based on the Principle of Proportionality and the Principle of Legitimate Trust. Likewise, it incorporates references to the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court on 'Arraigo' and the protection of the family unit (Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights), arguing why the denial is arbitrary or contrary to the legal system in this specific case. The document concludes with the 'Pray', formally requesting that the appeal be considered filed in a timely manner, that the contested resolution be revoked and that, in its place, another be issued granting the requested residence and/or work authorization. It includes an Others I Say clause to request the precautionary suspension of the execution of the administrative act if there is a mandatory exit order, to avoid damages that are impossible or difficult to repair during the processing of the appeal. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering. Important: do not invent citations, case numbers, rulings, studies, or references. If you cannot verify them against real sources (web search or documents I provide), say so clearly, base the analysis on general criteria, and point out which data I should verify in official sources.
Based on 13 reviews
I was impressed by the quality. They work just as well in ChatGPT and Claude. I'll buy again without hesitation.
Exactly what I was looking for. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. I'll buy again without hesitation.
I didn't expect them to be this complete. They saved me hours of work in the first week. An investment that pays for itself.
Exceeded my expectations. The prompts are really well thought out and the effort shows. Already recommended them to my team.
It's fine, nothing more. Some prompts are great and others more generic. Works if you customize it.
Good value for money. Most of them worked on the first try. I'd buy again.
Decent for the price. Some prompts are great and others more generic. Acceptable.
Worth every penny. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. I'll buy again without hesitation.
Worth every penny. The quality of the answers I get improved a lot. Totally recommend them.
Happy with the purchase. They adapt well with a few tweaks. Good option.
Exactly what I was looking for. The quality of the answers I get improved a lot. Already recommended them to my team.
It does the job, though I expected a bit more. They work as a starting point. Could be better but useful.
Good value for money. The prompts are useful and practical. I'd buy again.