Your cart is empty
Add prompt packs to continue
This premium collection of prompts for Customs Agents redefines efficiency in foreign trade through the strategic use of Artificial Intelligence. Designed for professionals seeking to minimize operational errors and optimize clearance times, each tool focuses on the technical precision and rigorous regulatory compliance demanded by today's customs environment. By integrating these prompts into their workflow, agents will be able to automate the review of files, improve tariff classification and strengthen risk management with authorities. It is the definitive solution to transform complex documentation into agile processes, guaranteeing impeccable traceability and a competitive advantage in global markets.
100 resources included
He acts as a Senior Customs Auditor with more than 20 years of experience in Inspection and Subsequent Control. Your main objective is to execute a Post-Dispatch Audit protocol focused on the "Import-Export Declaration Crossing". This analysis is critical to ensure that the operations of the company [Name of the Company or Client] do not present discrepancies that lead to fines for customs revenue fraud or errors in the determination of the tax base. To start the process, you must carry out a systematic comparison between the data declared in the Customs Import Declarations (DAI) and the linked Customs Export Declarations (DAE), especially for the [Specify Regime: e.g. Temporary Admission for Active Improvement or Reimportation in the same state]. I need you to identify inconsistencies in key fields such as: tariff subheading, FOB unit value, freight, insurance and, above all, the traceability of serial numbers or production lots of the merchandise [Description of Merchandise]. The analysis should focus on the detection of: 1. Differences in value that suggest a possible undervaluation or intentional overvaluation for tax purposes. 2. Errors in the application of tariff preferences under trade agreements [Mention Treaties: e.g. FTA with the US or European Union]. 3. Mismatches on the scale of weights and quantities that do not correspond to the tolerances allowed by current regulations. 4. Inconsistencies in the use of Incoterms [Incoterm used] declared in import versus outbound logistics. As a final result, it generates a Preventive Findings Report that includes a detailed comparative table by declaration number, a 'Red Alerts' section with the estimated calculation of omitted taxes or potential fines according to the customs tax code of [Country], and a voluntary rectification proposal. The tone must be technical, legalistic and oriented towards total risk mitigation in the event of an inspection by the supervisory authority.
He acts as a Senior Foreign Trade Consultant and technical expert in Rules of Origin for Customs Agents. Your task is to carry out an exhaustive and rigorous analysis of the origin determination using the Change of Tariff Classification (CTC) criteria, commonly known as Tariff Jump, for the final product identified as [Name of Final Product] under the tariff item [HS Code Final Product]. This analysis must be strictly based on the regulations of the [Name of the Treaty or Trade Agreement] applicable between [Country of Origin/Export] and [Country of Destination/Import]. The main objective is to validate whether the inputs imported from third countries (non-originating) listed below have undergone sufficient transformation to result in a change of heading, subheading or chapter, as required by the specific rule of origin (REO) for said merchandise. For each non-originating input provided in the bill of materials (BOM): [List of Inputs with their Tariff Codes], you must: 1) Compare its tariff classification (at the 2, 4 or 6 digit level as appropriate) with that of the finished product. 2) Technically determine whether the tariff jump required by the annex of specific rules of the treaty is met. 3) Identify possible classification conflicts that may put customs compliance at risk. The final report should be structured as follows: First, a technical summary of the applicable rule of origin. Second, a comparative table of tariff classification between inputs and final product. Third, a detailed legal justification based on the Explanatory Notes of the Harmonized System. Fourth, a binding conclusion on the qualification of origin under this specific criterion, omitting any analysis of costs or percentages of value. Use a professional, technical and legalistic tone, appropriate for a foreign trade audit. Make sure that the language is precise with respect to the tariff nomenclature in force in [Year of Nomenclature] and warn about minimal transformation processes that, although they change the fraction, are not considered sufficient under the text of the analyzed treaty.
Acts as a Senior Consultant Specialist in Customs Compliance and International Technical Regulations. Your primary objective is to design an exhaustive physical inspection protocol for the 'Mandatory Labeling Control' of the merchandise described as [Description of the Goods] with the tariff fraction [Tariff Fraction], destined for the [Customs Regime] regime in the country of [Country of Destination]. This protocol must be the definitive guide to ensure that all inspected units strictly comply with the commercial, sanitary or technical labeling regulations required by the [Competent Authority]. The technical analysis must begin with a visual audit of the physical label contrasted with the product technical sheet provided by the supplier. You must systematically verify the following critical points: Name or company name of the importer and manufacturer, country of origin (Made in...), detailed description of the product in language [Required Language], expiration or best before date if applicable, batch number, and the presence of safety warnings, handling symbols or mandatory certification seals required by law. It specifically details the procedure for evaluating legibility, minimum allowable font size, and durability of label adhesion under extreme weather conditions during transportation. In the scenario of detecting omissions or errors in labeling, develop a risk matrix that categorizes the impact of the discrepancy: from non-critical typographical errors to the complete absence of safety information. Defines a corrective action flow that contemplates the request for transfer to a 'Tax Warehouse' or the hiring of a 'Verification Unit' (UVA) to carry out the labeling in national territory under the supervision of the authority, specifying the legal deadlines available to avoid the abandonment of the merchandise or the imposition of fines for inaccurate data. To conclude, generate an executive technical report that serves as evidence of compliance for the Customs Agent. This report must include: 1) A quick verification checklist for operational personnel at the inspection platform, 2) A suggested photographic record of the control points, and 3) A formal recommendation on the feasibility of customs clearance based on compliance with the Non-Tariff Regulations and Restrictions (NRR) applicable to labeling at the time of clearance.