Your cart is empty
Add prompt packs to continue
100 professional prompts ready to copy and paste into ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini.
This master collection represents the cutting edge in tax risk analysis and audit process optimization using artificial intelligence. Designed specifically for auditors, accountants and tax advisors, this compendium of analytical tools allows you to transform traditional auditing into a predictive and highly accurate process, guaranteeing regulatory compliance in complex economic environments.
Just $0.08 per prompt · one-time payment
An instruction. The basis of every AI result.
Prompt
your instruction
AI
100 resources included
He acts as a senior consulting expert in Tax Procedural Law and Tax Defense Strategy with more than 20 years of experience in challenging administrative acts. Your objective is to carry out an exhaustive and critical analysis of an inspection procedure carried out by the Tax Administration of [COUNTRY/JURISDICTION], in order to identify defects of absolute nullity or voidability that allow supporting a claim, appeal or contentious-administrative lawsuit. To begin, carefully examine the file or notification of the administrative act identified as [FILE_NUMBER/RESOLUTION]. You must segment your analysis into four critical dimensions: 1) Competence Defects (if the body or official that issued the act lacked specific powers), 2) Procedural Defects (non-compliance with the substantial forms and legal stages of the inspection process), 3) Motivational Defects (lack of factual or legal support, arbitrary reasoning or inconsistency) and 4) Defects in the Notification (errors in the address, date, or recipient that violate due process). Develop a comparative table where you contrast the actions carried out by the inspector [INSPECTOR_NAME] against what is stipulated in the General Administrative Procedure Law and the Tax Code of [COUNTRY]. Pay special attention to the prescription and expiration periods of the inspection procedure, verifying whether there were undue interruptions or suspensions that have exceeded the maximum legal period of [PERIOD_MÁXIMO_FISCALIZACIÓN] months. It identifies whether there was a violation of the right of defense, such as the unjustified denial of extensions to present documentation or the omission to evaluate evidence provided by the taxpayer. Subsequently, it analyzes the 'Motivation of the Tax Act'. Evaluates whether the determination resolution is based on legal presumptions improperly applied or whether it lacks a clear relationship between the proven facts and the legal norm invoked. You must detect if there is a 'detrimental reform' (reformatio in pejus) or if the initial information request was so generic that it generated material defenselessness. Also consider the validity of the inspection reports, verifying whether they comply with the formalities of signature, presence of witnesses and detailed description of the findings. Finally, it generates a report of strategic conclusions structured by levels of risk and probability of success in court. For each defect detected, draft the legal defense argument using relevant doctrine and binding jurisprudence of the high courts of [COUNTRY]. Provides a recommendation on whether it is preferable to request the total annulment of the procedure or the partial annulment of certain tax objections, based on the principle of conservation of the administrative act and the seriousness of the procedural infraction committed by the authority. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering. Important: do not invent citations, case numbers, rulings, studies, or references. If you cannot verify them against real sources (web search or documents I provide), say so clearly, base the analysis on general criteria, and point out which data I should verify in official sources.
Instant access after purchase from your dashboard. Just copy and paste into your AI.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Qwen and any AI chat.
Yes. Every prompt includes bracketed fields where you insert your own information, context and specifics, so they fit your situation, country or industry.
Yes. Above you can read full sample prompts, exactly as you'll receive them, to check the quality before paying.
Yes. Pay once and they're yours forever, updates included.
Result
He acts as a Senior Auditor specialized in Transfer Pricing and International Tax Supervision with deep knowledge of the OECD Guidelines. Your objective is to carry out a comprehensive evaluation of the payment of royalties or fees for the use of intangibles made by the entity [Name of the Company Subject to Audit] to its related party [Name of the Beneficiary Entity], located in [Jurisdiction of the Beneficiary Entity]. The analysis should focus on verifying whether the [Agreed Royalty Percentage]% rate on [Calculation Base, e.g. Gross Sales] complies with the arm's length principle (Arm's Length Principle) and whether there is an unjustified erosion of the tax base in the local jurisdiction. Start the analysis by applying the DEMPE (Development, Improvement, Maintenance, Protection and Exploitation) approach. You must break down which entity actually performs the critical functions, assumes the economically significant risks, and controls the assets necessary for the creation of the intangible [Detailed Description of the Intangible Asset]. Evaluate whether the local entity is simply acting as a routine licensee or whether it is uniquely contributing to the value of the asset in its local market, which could invalidate or reduce the royalty payment. Proceed to perform a technical comparability analysis. Use the Comparable Free Price Method (CUP) or, failing that, the Profit Split Method or the Transaction Net Margin Method (TNMM) to validate the rate. Compare the contractual terms of the license agreement with [Description of Available Internal or External Comparables] and adjust for differences in exclusivity, geographic coverage, contract duration, and stages of development of the intangible. It is imperative that you identify whether the intangible has characteristics of 'Intangible that is Difficult to Valuate' (HTVI). Identify warning signs of base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). Analyze whether the royalty expense results in an operating loss for the local entity while the global group reports profits, or if the royalty rate exceeds the incremental benefit that the intangible brings to the business. Prepare a table of findings that summarizes the risks of tax adjustment, possible sanctions under the regulations of [Country where the audit is carried out] and recommendations for the defense or adjustment of the company's tax position. Finally, generate a formal technical conclusion that determines whether the intellectual property charge is deductible, partially deductible or if it should be reclassified as a disguised dividend distribution, based on the economic substance of the legal form of the license agreement analyzed. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
He acts as a Senior Auditor specialized in Corporate Taxation and Deduction Control with extensive experience in reviewing representation expense policies. Your objective is to carry out an exhaustive analysis of the accounting account for 'Protocol Attentions' and 'Representation Expenses' of the company [Company Name] for the period [Fiscal Year]. You must determine if these expenses meet the causality and materiality requirements, and if they are within the quantitative limits established by the regulations of [Country/Jurisdiction], which imposes a limit of [Limit Percentage]% with respect to the estimated annual net income in [Total Amount of Income]. The analysis should begin with a review of the reasonableness of the expenses in relation to the line of business. Evaluate whether services to clients, suppliers or third parties are properly documented with legal invoices, proof of payment and, crucially, with clear identification of the beneficiary and the commercial purpose of the event or gift. You must identify possible risks of tax avoidance where attempts are made to deduct personal expenses of directors or partners, such as [Examples of Suspicious Expenses: jewelry, leisure trips, exclusive memberships], under the concept of business courtesies. Subsequently, it proceeds to calculate the allowed deductibility. To do this, use the following transaction database: [Insert or Describe List of Transactions]. Classify each item as 'Deductible', 'Non-Deductible' or 'Subject to Limit'. In the case of expenses that exceed the legal limit of [Limit Percentage]%, it automatically calculates the extra-accounting adjustment necessary for the Income Tax sworn declaration. Be sure to verify that food or entertainment expenses that do not have a direct relationship with the generation of taxable income have not been included. Finally, write a tax audit report that includes: 1. An executive summary of regulatory compliance. 2. A detailed table with the rejected expenses and the legal basis for the challenge. 3. The calculation of the fiscal impact (omitted tax and possible fines) derived from the excesses detected. 4. A series of internal control recommendations for financial management on how to improve the traceability of protocol services in the future, based on compliance standards of [Country/Jurisdiction]. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
Based on 10 reviews
Best purchase I made this month. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. Already recommended them to my team.
It helped me quite a bit. Most of them worked on the first try. Good option.
I was impressed by the quality. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. Totally recommend them.
It's fine, nothing more. They work as a starting point. Acceptable.
I was impressed by the quality. They're easy to adapt to my case by just changing the fields. An investment that pays for itself.
I didn't expect them to be this complete. The prompts are really well thought out and the effort shows. Already recommended them to my team.
I didn't expect them to be this complete. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. An investment that pays for itself.
Best purchase I made this month. They're easy to adapt to my case by just changing the fields. One hundred percent recommended.
I didn't expect them to be this complete. They work just as well in ChatGPT and Claude. One hundred percent recommended.
Worth every penny. They saved me hours of work in the first week. I'll buy again without hesitation.