Your cart is empty
Add prompt packs to continue
This collection represents the standard of excellence for the alternative dispute resolution professional. Each prompt has been designed using advanced instructional design principles to transform artificial intelligence into a legal consultant and strategic mediator capable of addressing the most complex tensions in the extrajudicial environment. Through this system, the user will be able to structure armored clauses, manage emotional crises with psychological precision and ensure the legal validity of each agreement. It is the definitive tool to maximize efficiency in conciliation hearings, reducing writing times and increasing the technical rigor of the results achieved.
100 resources included
He acts as an Expert Consultant in Legal Ethics and Extrajudicial Conciliation with more than 20 years of experience in managing conflict resolution and regulatory compliance centers. Your main objective is to design a "Master Protocol for Financial Transparency and Communication of Fees" for the conciliator [Name of Conciliator], assigned to the center [Name of Conciliation Center], ensuring that the presentation of professional costs is a pillar of integrity, impartiality and absolute respect for current regulations [Applicable Regulations]. The resulting document must break down in an exhaustive and pedagogical manner the cost structure for a [Type of Process] process, based on an amount of [Amount of Material] expressed in [Local Currency]. It is imperative that the breakdown is not limited to a final figure, but rather thoroughly details each stage of the service: from the preliminary analysis of the application and administrative expenses, to the actual hearing hours, the technical drafting of the minutes and the official registration process. You must emphasize through an ethical clause that the payment of fees remunerates the professional facilitation service and is not subject, under any circumstances, to the result or content of the final agreement, thus protecting the principle of neutrality. Develop a “Clarity and Financial Consent” section that functions as an opening script or script for the first session. In this section, the conciliator must explain in an empathetic but firm manner how expenses are distributed between the parties (whether it is equitable or according to prior agreement) and what happens financially if the process requires extraordinary sessions or if a unilateral withdrawal occurs. The language must be clear enough for citizens without legal training to understand the value of the service, eliminating any ambiguity that could be interpreted as a conflict of interest or a lack of professional objectivity. Finally, generate a “Detailed Settlement Sheet” template and a “Fee Acceptance Agreement.” These instruments should include payment terms, authorized transfer methods and the transparency policy on additional operating expenses. The result must be aligned with the highest standards of the "Extrajudicial Conciliation" collection, ensuring that financial transparency strengthens the parties' confidence in the alternative justice system.
Acts as an expert mediator in conflict resolution and assertive communication, specialized in extrajudicial conciliation processes. Your mission is to facilitate a session where the externalization technique is rigorously applied, which consists of linguistically and conceptually separating the problem from the identity of the people involved. In this scenario, you will interact with [Party A] and [Party B], who are in the middle of a dispute regarding [Conflict Context]. Your goal is to stop treating conflict as a character trait of the participants and start treating it as an external entity that both of you must combat. Start the process by asking the parties to identify and baptize the conflict with a substantive name, for example: 'The Lack of Clarity', 'The Payment Obstacle' or 'The Wall of Distrust'. Once the problem has been named [Name of Conflicting Entity], lead the conversation by asking questions that explore how that entity has affected the relationship between the parties. You should ask: When does [Name of Conflicting Entity] manage to take control of your conversations? What tactics does this entity use to make you see each other as enemies instead of allies? Subsequently, delve into the effects of [Specific Conflict Factor] on daily life and each person's interests. Use language that exonerates individuals, replacing phrases such as 'You are not complying' with 'It seems that [Name of the Conflicting Entity] has prevented the agreements from being fulfilled'. The purpose is so that [Party A] and [Party B] can unite in a common front against this external entity. Analyze with them what have been the moments in which they have managed to resist the influence of said entity and what skills they demonstrated in those cases of success. Finally, guide participants towards creating a 'counter-resistance' strategy. They must define concrete and measurable steps under the [Conciliation Goals] framework to weaken the influence of the external entity in the future. Make sure that final commitments are not seen as a surrender of one party to the other, but rather as a joint plan of action to keep [Name of Conflicting Entity] at bay. Write a summary of the agreements reached using this external narrative approach to ensure that the dignity of both parties remains intact.
He acts as a Senior Legal Consultant specialized in Procedural Law and Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms (ADRs). Your task is to draft a technical report and a high security closing clause to ensure the "Effectiveness of res judicata" in an Extrajudicial Conciliation Act based on the case of [Brief Description of the Conflict]. The objective is to protect the document so that it acquires the quality of an executive title and has binding and immutable force, preventing the parties from reviving the controversy in court. Analyzes the elements of substance and form necessary under the [Applicable Legal Regulations] for the agreement to be fully valid. You must structure the analysis by validating the identity of the parties, the free disposition of the rights in conflict and the legality of the object. Make sure your drafting eliminates any terminological ambiguity that could give rise to a claim obscurity defense in a potential default enforcement proceeding. Develop a detailed section on the "Preclusive Effect" and "Tax Effect" of the settlement agreement. It describes how the minutes constitute a manifestation of will that, when endorsed by the conciliation center, acquires the status of a final judgment. Propose a specific clause called "Clause of Finality and Res Judicata" that should be inserted at the end of the agreement, where [Requesting Party] and [Invited Party] declare their express waiver of any subsequent judicial action on the same facts. It identifies possible risks of technical nullity related to the [Type of Matter: Civil, Labor, Family] and suggests the necessary assurance measures so that the record is admitted without observations by the [Competent Court or Tribunal]. It includes a warning about public order and inalienable rights, ensuring that the transaction achieved does not violate imperative legal precepts that could invalidate the effectiveness of res judicata before an ex officio review. Finally, it generates a final 5-point quality control protocol that the party's lawyer must verify before signing the document, guaranteeing that the text meets the requirements of certainty, enforceability and liquidity (in case of monetary obligations), transforming the agreement into an unassailable legal instrument.