Your cart is empty
Add prompt packs to continue
100 professional prompts ready to copy and paste into ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini.
Optimize your teaching work with the definitive collection of artificial intelligence prompts, designed specifically to transform modern pedagogical management. This comprehensive resource allows you to automate complex administrative tasks, from writing technical reports to designing accurate rubrics, giving valuable time back to the teacher to focus on what really matters: inspiring teaching. Each prompt has been structured under advanced instructional design principles to guarantee high quality results in curricular planning, educational inclusion and active methodologies. Raise the standard of your learning sessions and personalize your students' education with cutting-edge tools that ensure pedagogical coherence and operational efficiency at any educational level.
Just $0.08 per prompt · one-time payment
An instruction. The basis of every AI result.
Prompt
your instruction
AI
100 resources included
He acts as an expert in educational communication and neurodidactics applied to the classroom. Your mission is to design a literary and technical script for a captivating masterful explanation of the topic: [INSERT KEY TOPIC OR CONCEPT]. The script must be optimized to maintain the sustained attention of students of [EDUCATIONAL LEVEL] during an intervention of approximately [DURATION IN MINUTES]. The tone should be [STYLE: EX. INSPIRATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC, NARRATIVE] and must avoid excessively dense language without ever losing the academic depth necessary for the level. The structure of the script must strictly follow this narrative scheme: 1. The Hook: An anecdote, a paradox or a counterintuitive piece of information that breaks the student's state of mental rest. 2. The Why: Explain the vital relevance of this knowledge and what real-world problem it helps solve. 3. The Body of the Concept: Breaks down the subject into three fundamental pillars, using powerful analogies that connect the abstract with everyday objects or situations that students already know. 4. The Connection Bridge: Relate this new knowledge with [PRIOR GROUP KNOWLEDGE] to ensure a solid anchor in semantic memory. You must include 'Scene Annotations' in the text in parentheses for the teacher, suggesting when to vary the modulation of the voice, when to perform a three-second dramatic silence, and when to rely on a specific visual element. In addition, it integrates three 'Check Points' where the teacher must ask a challenging question so that the student's brain actively processes the information. The script should end with an 'Impact Closing' that summarizes the main idea in a single memorable sentence and poses an intellectual challenge for the next phase of the class. Finally, generate a brief support guide with three practical examples or brief case studies that the teacher can mention if they notice that the group has lost the common thread. Make sure the language is fluid, rhythmic, and designed to be read or performed aloud, using figures of speech such as alliteration or anaphora to emphasize the most critical points of the explanation. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
Instant access after purchase from your dashboard. Just copy and paste into your AI.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Qwen and any AI chat.
Yes. Every prompt includes bracketed fields where you insert your own information, context and specifics, so they fit your situation, country or industry.
Yes. Above you can read full sample prompts, exactly as you'll receive them, to check the quality before paying.
Yes. Pay once and they're yours forever, updates included.
Result
He acts as an expert consultant in educational evaluation and instructional design with extensive experience in the development of learning measurement instruments. Your mission is to design an analytical rubric of high technical precision to objectively and transparently evaluate the performance of students in the task of [TYPE OF ACTIVITY OR PRODUCT TO BE EVALUATED], designed for the context of the subject of [NAME OF THE SUBJECT] at the level of [EDUCATIONAL LEVEL OR GRADE]. The design of the rubric should be based on Bloom's taxonomy and strictly aligned with the learning objective of [DESCRIBE LEARNING OBJECTIVE]. You must construct a double-entry table that contains at least five dimensions or evaluation criteria (for example: content, structure, use of language, critical thinking and [ADDITIONAL SPECIFIC CRITERIA]). For each dimension, it establishes four clearly differentiated levels of performance: Excellent (Level 4), Competent (Level 3), Developing (Level 2) and Insufficient (Level 1). It is essential that the descriptors in each cell be written qualitatively, avoiding subjective value judgments and focusing on observable and measurable evidence of learning. Make sure the transition between levels is logical and progressive. Additionally, include a 'Weight' column where you assign a specific percentage weight to each criterion based on its pedagogical relevance to [EXPECTED LEARNING OUTCOME], ensuring that the total sum is 100%. Finally, it generates a section of general recommendations for teaching feedback, suggesting typical phrases for each level of performance detected and proposals for immediate improvement for students who are in levels 1 and 2. The structure must be clear, professional and ready to be implemented in a hybrid or face-to-face learning environment under the regulations of [COUNTRY OR INSTITUTION]. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
He acts as a Senior Pedagogical Consultant specialized in Formative Assessment and Curriculum Design with more than 20 years of experience in teacher training. Your mission is to design a comprehensive and highly personalized "Constructive Feedback Bank" for the subject of [Name of Subject] aimed at students of [Educational Level: Primary/Secondary/University]. This resource should allow the teacher to offer a qualitative assessment that not only qualifies, but transforms the student's learning process, based on Bloom's taxonomy and the principles of evaluation for learning. The feedback bank should be meticulously organized following four clear performance levels: Outstanding, Proficient, Developing, and Initiating. For each level and for the specific criterion of [Evaluation criterion, e.g.: Argumentative coherence or Problem solving], you must generate at least seven variants of comments that avoid the use of generic phrases. Each comment must necessarily integrate the structure of Daniel Wilson's "Feedback Ladder": Assess (recognize the positive), Express concerns (identify the learning gap) and Suggest (offer specific action steps or Feed-forward). It is essential that the language be empathetic, assertive and motivating, adapting to the characteristics of the [Student Profile: e.g. students with high motivation, students with learning difficulties or digital natives]. Consider including suggestions for additional resources such as [Resource Type: Videos, Readings, Practice Exercises] within the improvement comments. The final result must be delivered in a professional table format that facilitates the search and selection of the most appropriate comment for each pedagogical situation, guaranteeing that the teacher reduces his or her administrative burden while increasing the quality of the feedback delivered. Finally, make sure that the phrase bank promotes metacognition, posing reflective questions that invite the student to think about their own production process. For example, instead of saying 'it lacks clarity', use a construction that invites revision: 'Your main idea is powerful; However, how could you rearrange the connectors in the second paragraph so that the reader can follow your story line effortlessly?' The bench must cover the dimensions of [Dimension 1: Content], [Dimension 2: Structure] and [Dimension 3: Use of language/technique]. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
Based on 12 reviews
Exceeded my expectations. They work just as well in ChatGPT and Claude. Totally recommend them.
It helped me quite a bit. Most of them worked on the first try. I recommend it.
Worth every penny. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. One hundred percent recommended.
Exceeded my expectations. The prompts are really well thought out and the effort shows. Already recommended them to my team.
I didn't expect them to be this complete. The prompts are really well thought out and the effort shows. One hundred percent recommended.
It helped me quite a bit. The prompts are useful and practical. Came close to a five.
I was impressed by the quality. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. One hundred percent recommended.
Worth every penny. They work just as well in ChatGPT and Claude. One hundred percent recommended.
Best purchase I made this month. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. Already recommended them to my team.
I didn't expect them to be this complete. The quality of the answers I get improved a lot. Totally recommend them.
Exactly what I was looking for. They work just as well in ChatGPT and Claude. Already recommended them to my team.
Exceeded my expectations. The quality of the answers I get improved a lot. I'll buy again without hesitation.