CC
Carlos C.Verified purchase
Your cart is empty
Add prompt packs to continue
Copy, paste and use them in your favorite AI:
Just $0.08 per prompt · one-time payment
100 resources included
This collection of prompts represents the gold standard for professionals in the legal and forensic field. Designed with technical precision, it allows structuring irrefutable expert reports and developing surgical counter-expertise strategies that expose methodological vulnerabilities in the judicial process. Each prompt has been optimized to address critical niches of forensic evidence, from advanced computer science to clinical psychology. By using this resource, the consultant or lawyer guarantees unprecedented analytical depth, ensuring that each conclusion is supported by methodological rigor and strict compliance with current legal regulations.
He acts as a Senior Expert in Criminalistics and Forensic Photography, specialized in preparing reports for the 'Technical Chain of Custody' section. Your objective is to design an exhaustive photographic fixation protocol and an expert report model for a case of [BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE CRIMINAL ACT]. The document must serve both for the accusation and to withstand a forensic counter-expertise audit, ensuring the traceability and integrity of the physical and biological evidence found in [EXACT LOCATION OF THE SCENE]. Develop a technical methodology that covers the four levels of photographic recording: 1. General Views (Panoramic views that locate the scene in its environment), 2. Medium Shots (That establish the spatial relationship between the clues and fixed reference points), 3. Close-Ups (Individual fixation of each clue with and without metric witness), and 4. Macros (Microscopic details or biological traces with specific lighting). For each level, specify the required technical settings: [ISO VALUES], diaphragm aperture for maximum depth of field, and the use of lighting techniques [LIGHTING TECHNIQUE: CENITAL, GRASS, TRANSMISSION]. It includes a critical section on the Digital Chain of Custody. Explains the procedure for generating hash signatures (SHA-256 or similar) immediately after capture to ensure that EXIF metadata is not altered. Includes guidelines for filling out the chain of custody record, mentioning the storage medium used, the camera serial number [CAMERA MODEL] and the post-processing software (only for digital development without content alteration). In addition, you should provide a 'Forensic Counter-Experience' section where possible common errors such as perspective distortion or incorrect use of flash that could compromise the legal validity of the photographs as evidence are analyzed. Finally, it generates a technical index of all the captures made, linking each photograph number with the clue number [LIST OF INDICATIONS], describing the criminalistic relevance of the shot and ensuring that the visual narrative of the scene is coherent, logical and complies with international standards of legal medicine and forensic sciences. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
Instant access after purchase from your dashboard. Just copy and paste into your AI.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Qwen and any AI chat.
Yes. Every prompt includes bracketed fields where you insert your own information, context and specifics, so they fit your situation, country or industry.
Yes. Above you can read full sample prompts, exactly as you'll receive them, to check the quality before paying.
Yes. Pay once and they're yours forever, updates included.
He acts as a Senior Computer Forensic Expert with specialization in cybercrime and analysis of digital evidence in corporate environments. Your objective is to generate an exhaustive technical expert report under the premise of **Digital identity theft identification** within the system [AFFECTED SYSTEM OR PLATFORM]. The report must be structured following international computer forensic protocols, ensuring that each finding is reproducible and verifiable in a court of law. It begins with a detailed methodology on the acquisition of evidence, mentioning the use of write blocking tools and the generation of bit-by-bit forensic images of the devices [DEVICES INVOLVED]. Describes the hashing procedure using the algorithm [HASH ALGORITHM: SHA-256 OR MD5] to ensure that the chain of custody has not been breached from initial collection to final analysis in the forensic laboratory. Develop a deep technical analysis of access records (logs). You must compare the usual IP addresses of the legitimate user against the IP addresses detected during the incident, analyzing the ASN, the Internet Service Provider (ISP) and the suspicious geolocation of the latter. It incorporates the analysis of the User-Agent strings to determine if there was a change in the hardware, operating system or browser used by the alleged impersonator compared to the user's historical profile in [ANALYZED TIME PERIOD]. Explores the possible presence of specific attack vectors that facilitated impersonation, such as Session Hijacking, Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attacks, or the use of leaked credentials in previous data breaches. Analyzes the metadata of files modified or sent during the committed session, looking for discrepancies in timestamps and file source paths within the file system [FILE SYSTEM: NTFS, EXT4, APFS]. Finally, prepare a conclusions section where all the technical evidence is correlated to confirm or deny identity theft. Provides a counter-expertise that evaluates whether the lack of security measures, such as Multiple Factor Authentication (MFA), may have been the catalyst for the incident. The report must conclude with a statement of truth signed by the expert, in accordance with the legal regulations of [JURISDICTION OR COUNTRY]. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
Act as an Elite Forensic Expert specialized in Field Criminalistics and Chain of Custody Management with in-depth knowledge of ISO/IEC 17025 standards. Your objective is to design an advanced technical protocol and a master document called 'Judicial reception delivery format' to ensure the traceability, sameness and integrity of highly sensitive physical and biological evidence collected at the crime scene. The document must be designed to mitigate any risk of contamination, alteration, substitution or loss of evidentiary value. It compulsorily includes a 'Biological Preservation Protocol' section that details the conditions of temperature (cold chain), humidity and light exposure necessary for [Type of Biological Indicator: Blood/Semen/Tissue]. Structure the format with the following technical fields: 1. Administrative Identification (NUC/Investigation Folder: [Insert Number], Location of Finding: [Exact Location]). 2. Taxonomic Description of the Evidence (Nature: [Physical/Biological], Quantity, Weight, Dimensions and Initial Conservation State). 3. Packaging and Packaging (Type of container: [Paper bag/Test tube/Rigid container], Security Seal Number: [Seal sheet], Signature on the seal). Develop a 'Continuous Custody Traceability' section where each change of holder is recorded chronologically and uninterruptedly, including: Complete identification of the issuer and receiver, Position, Institution, Purpose of the transfer (Transfer, Laboratory Analysis, Safeguarding or Presentation in Court), and a 'Visual Integrity Examination' section to confirm that the seals and packaging are intact at the time of receipt. Finally, it generates an annex of 'Technical Handling Instructions' for transport personnel, specifying that in the event of accidental rupture of the packaging, they must proceed under the [Contingency Procedure] protocol and immediately notify the Public Ministry or corresponding judicial authority so as not to break the chain of technical custody. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
It's a master instruction, optimized for AI.
Prompt
your instruction
AI
Result
Based on 8 reviews
Worth every penny. They're easy to adapt to my case by just changing the fields. Totally recommend them.
Good value for money. The prompts are useful and practical. Good option.
Exactly what I was looking for. They're easy to adapt to my case by just changing the fields. An investment that pays for itself.
Decent for the price. Some prompts are great and others more generic. Acceptable.
Decent for the price. I had to tweak them quite a bit for my case. Acceptable.
It helped me quite a bit. Most of them worked on the first try. Came close to a five.
Worth every penny. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. One hundred percent recommended.
Good value for money. The prompts are useful and practical. I recommend it.