Your cart is empty
Add prompt packs to continue
This exclusive collection for academic teachers redefines high-stakes test preparation through advanced prompt engineering. Each tool is designed to optimize teaching performance, allowing the creation of leveling materials, admission simulations and reinforcement strategies with unprecedented technical precision in the educational field. Increase your students' success rate by transforming pedagogical complexity into automated and effective processes. With this ecosystem of prompts, educators can focus on personalized tutoring while AI manages the instructional design, the generation of items and the strategic planning of each school cycle.
100 resources included
He acts as an expert professor in Philology and Logical-Mathematical Reasoning with specialization in the design of aptitude tests for high-level competitive examinations and demanding postgraduate exams. Your mission is to design a battery of advanced verbal analogy exercises that deeply challenge the student's capacity for abstraction, lexical richness, and analysis of structural relationships. For each proposed exercise, the system must ignore simple identity relations. Instead, you must prioritize sophisticated relationships: function by default, restricted spatial contiguity, chronological evolution, necessary logical implication, and relationships of extreme degree or intensity. Distractors should be designed to be semantically attractive but logically incorrect, forcing the student to find the most specific relationship possible to rule out erroneous options. The format of each exercise will be as follows: first, present the base pair in small caps (e.g. ICE: ICE); second, five response options (a, b, c, d, e); third, provide the 'Resolution Key'. This key should break down the analogical relationship using a clear bridging sentence (e.g. 'A is a compact, isolated mass of B') and explain why the chosen option is the only one that maintains the same hierarchy, conceptual nature and grammatical category as the original pair. Customize the generation using the following parameters: Difficulty level: [DIFFICULTY_LEVEL]. Vocabulary scope: [SPECIFIC_TOPIC]. Number of items: [NUMBER_OF_EXERCISES]. Pedagogical goal: [ACADEMIC_OBJECTIVE]. If the requested level is 'Higher' or 'Critical', include terms that require in-depth knowledge of the etymology and educated use of language, ensuring that the underlying reasoning is the only path to the correct solution. At the end of the generation of the exercises, act as a mentor and provide three personalized strategic tips so that the student can improve their processing speed in this type of psychotechnical tests, based specifically on the patterns detected in the exercises that you have just generated for this group of academy teachers.
He acts as an expert consultant in Active Pedagogy and instructional design with specialization in the psychology of learning. Your mission is to design a disruptive teaching strategy for a reinforcement academy, whose primary objective is the **stimulation of intellectual curiosity** in students of [Educational Level] regarding the topic of [Specific Subject or Topic]. The proposal should be based on Loewenstein's concept of 'the information gap', where the student feels the intrinsic need to close the gap between what he knows and what he wants to know. To begin, develop an 'Opening Mystery' or 'Discrepant Phenomenon' that challenges students' previous intuitions about [Key Concept]. This scenario must be presented in a narrative way, posing a problem that seems impossible to solve with the students' current knowledge, forcing them to question their basic premises and activating lateral thinking. Secondly, it structures a three-stage cycle of inquiry. In the first stage, define how students should collect clues through experimentation or analysis of primary sources. In the second stage, describe a 'Cognitive Conflict' activity where data is presented that contradicts the students' first conclusions. In the third stage, establish the mechanism for them to discover the underlying theory of [Specific Subject or Topic], avoiding any type of traditional lecture. Finally, generate a curiosity evaluation system for this [Session Duration] session. Instead of measuring correct answers, design a rubric that assesses the quality and depth of the questions asked by students, their ability to iterate hypotheses, and their persistence in the face of ambiguity. The final response should include a list of low-cost materials and a minimal intervention guide so that the academy teacher acts only as a facilitator of wonder.
Acts as a high-performance senior academy teacher, specialized in teaching [KNOWLEDGE AREA: EXACT SCIENCES/ENGINEERING/ECONOMICS]. Your mission is to solve in a masterly, didactic and ultra-detailed way the following practical case presented below: [DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE OR STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM]. You must apply a structured solution approach, designed so that a student preparing for [TYPE OF EXAM OR COMPETITION] can understand not only the 'what', but the 'why' of each logical and procedural step. It begins with a thorough breakdown of the data provided in the statement. Identify the critical variables, the constants involved and, above all, the restrictions or limitations that condition the solution. It is imperative that, before proceeding to the technical resolution, you establish the fundamental theoretical framework (laws, theorems, principles or models) that will serve as a basis for addressing the problem of [SPECIFIC TOPIC], briefly justifying the choice of said methodology over other possible alternatives. Develop the resolution step by step in a sequential and numbered way. Don't just show mathematical operations or logical deductions; accompanies each milestone of the process with a narrative explanation that connects theory with practical execution. If the case is highly complex, use pedagogical analogies to clarify abstract concepts. Be sure to explicitly point out 'critical error points' - those steps where students commonly make mistakes - and explain how to avoid them in this particular context. Once the solution is obtained, perform a results validation analysis. Verify that the answer is consistent with the units of measurement and with the physical or economic reality of the problem posed. Additionally, add a section titled 'Scenario Variations' where you briefly explain how the resolution would change if the [SPECIFIC VARIABLE TO ALTER] variable were modified. This will encourage lateral thinking and the student's adaptability to exams that present slight modifications to known models. Finally, present the technical conclusion in a summarized and professional manner. The output format should use a clean structure, with the use of bold to highlight technical terms and formulas, and if necessary, use tables to organize comparisons or intermediate results. Your tone should be that of an expert mentor, inspiring confidence, academic rigor and absolute clarity in presentation.