LM
Lucía M.Verified purchase
Your cart is empty
Add prompt packs to continue
100 professional prompts ready to copy and paste into ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini.
This exclusive collection for academic teachers redefines high-stakes test preparation through advanced prompt engineering. Each tool is designed to optimize teaching performance, allowing the creation of leveling materials, admission simulations and reinforcement strategies with unprecedented technical precision in the educational field. Increase your students' success rate by transforming pedagogical complexity into automated and effective processes. With this ecosystem of prompts, educators can focus on personalized tutoring while AI manages the instructional design, the generation of items and the strategic planning of each school cycle.
Just $0.08 per prompt · one-time payment
An instruction. The basis of every AI result.
Prompt
your instruction
AI
100 resources included
He acts as an expert professor in academic research methodology and critical discourse analysis. Your mission is to perform an advanced level "Documentary Source Criticism" on the material titled [Document Name], authored by [Author] and originally produced on [Publication Date]. This exercise is essential for the training of high-level researchers and students, focusing on deep reading comprehension and the validation of the scientific reliability of the text provided within the framework of the 'Academy Professors' collection. First, perform an exhaustive External Criticism (Heuristic). Evaluate the provenance, originality and material integrity of the document. Analyze whether the language, terminology, and references cited are consistent with the period of [Publication Date]. Determines whether we are dealing with a primary or secondary source and how its support or diffusion channel influences the transmission of the message. It is crucial to establish whether the source has undergone editing, translation or censorship processes that alter its original nature before being subjected to this scrutiny. Second, proceed with a highly precise Internal Criticism (Hermeneutics). Don't settle for a superficial analysis; deconstructs the discourse to identify the intentionality of [Author], his possible cognitive, ideological or institutional biases and the sociopolitical context of [Historical Context] that permeates the work. Analyzes the internal consistency of the argument and the veracity of the data presented, comparing them with the current academic consensus. You must detect voluntary silences, rhetorical emphases, and the target audience the author originally intended to influence, evaluating how these elements affect the objectivity of the information. Third, establish an evidence triangulation strategy. Suggest what other documents, records or contemporary evidence could be necessary to validate or refute the theses presented in the analyzed text. Reflect on how [Author]'s social, academic, or political position affects the neutrality of the story. The goal is for the user to understand that no document is a transparent window to reality, but rather a construct that requires critical distancing from the literal content to observe the underlying structure of power, knowledge and purpose. It concludes with a technical pedagogical opinion on the usefulness and relevance of this source for the study of [Objective of the analysis]. This opinion should serve as a model methodological guide, demonstrating how to apply scientific rigor in the evaluation of complex texts. The final report should be detailed, organized into clear sections, and use technical language appropriate for higher education and academic scientific research. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
Instant access after purchase from your dashboard. Just copy and paste into your AI.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Qwen and any AI chat.
Yes. Every prompt includes bracketed fields where you insert your own information, context and specifics, so they fit your situation, country or industry.
Yes. Above you can read full sample prompts, exactly as you'll receive them, to check the quality before paying.
Yes. Pay once and they're yours forever, updates included.
Result
He acts as an expert in curriculum design, psychometrics and academic leveling with extensive experience in creating formative assessment tools. Your objective is to design a comprehensive diagnostic instrument for the subject of [Name of the Subject] aimed at students of [Educational Level/Grade] who are about to start the thematic block of [Name of the Topic or Unit]. The main purpose is to accurately identify conceptual gaps, unconsolidated prerequisites and alternative ideas or common errors that could hinder the learning of new content. The diagnosis should be empathetic, challenging but accessible, and designed to be completed in an estimated time of [Available time, e.g. 45 minutes]. The diagnostic exam must be structured in four differentiated technical sections: 1) Theoretical Foundations (evaluation of basic concepts through multiple choice questions with distractors based on typical errors), 2) Procedural Skills (practical exercises where the execution of processes or algorithms is demonstrated), 3) Analysis and Contextualization (a small case study or situated problem that requires critical thinking), and 4) Metacognitive Self-Assessment (three questions that ask the student about their level of confidence in the topics evaluated). Make sure the items are aligned with the standards of [Mention Educational Standard or Framework]. To facilitate the teaching work, generate a 'Results Interpretation Matrix' after the exam. This matrix should link each question to a specific expected learning and provide a leveling roadmap. For each gap detected (Low, Medium, High Level), it suggests a specific reinforcement activity, a recommended teaching resource and a differentiated teaching strategy that the teacher can immediately implement in the classroom. It also includes a detailed analytical rubric that allows grading the student's overall performance in terms of their preparation for the new academic challenges of the [Course Name] course. Variables to personalize the diagnosis: - Specific subject: [Insert Subject] - Unit/Topic to start: [Insert Topic] - Essential prior knowledge: [List 3-5 key prior concepts] - Context of the academy: [Briefly describe the profile of the students] If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
He acts as a Senior Consultant in Educational Digital Transformation with 15 years of experience optimizing private training centers. Your objective is to carry out a comprehensive and critical audit of the entire technological ecosystem of the [Academy Name] academy, specialized in [Academy Specialty]. The audit should focus on identifying operational bottlenecks, software redundancies that generate unnecessary expenses, and pedagogical gaps where current technology is not meeting the learning objectives of students at the [Student Educational Level] level. The analysis should be structured using the SAMR and TPACK frameworks to evaluate whether current tools, such as [List of Tools and Software in Use], are being used simply as substitutes for analog processes or if they are truly redefining the educational experience. Evaluates interoperability between the LMS (Learning Management System), videoconferencing tools and content repositories, ensuring that data flow is efficient and that teaching staff of [Number of Teachers] do not suffer from digital fatigue due to an excess of disconnected platforms. Develop a technical and pedagogical evaluation matrix that rates each digital resource on a scale of 1 to 10 based on: ease of adoption, maintenance cost, level of interactivity and data analysis capacity (learning analytics). For the area of [Department or Specific Area to Audit], specifically identify whether digital resources allow effective personalization of learning or if they are generic tools that limit the differentiating value proposition of our academy compared to the competition. Complete the audit by generating an executive diagnostic report that includes a 'Continuity Traffic Light': green for optimized tools, yellow for those that require additional training or configuration adjustments, and red for those that should be decommissioned or replaced with alternatives such as [Potential Tools to Consider]. The report should conclude with a schedule for implementing improvements by [Action Plan Deadline, e.g. 3 months] that details those responsible and the key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure the success of this technological optimization. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
Based on 8 reviews
Delivers what it promises. They saved me time on several tasks. Good option.
It does the job, though I expected a bit more. They work as a starting point. Could be better but useful.
I was impressed by the quality. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. One hundred percent recommended.
I didn't expect them to be this complete. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. Already recommended them to my team.
Worth every penny. They saved me hours of work in the first week. Totally recommend them.
Best purchase I made this month. They saved me hours of work in the first week. Already recommended them to my team.
Exceeded my expectations. They saved me hours of work in the first week. I'll buy again without hesitation.
It's fine, nothing more. Some prompts are great and others more generic. Could be better but useful.